|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Home
» Archive
» 2023
» Veterinary Session
Veterinary sessionMørk Nora Elizabeth - year 6 University of Veterinary Medicine Budapest, Department Animal Breeding, Nutrition and Laboratory Animal Science Supervisor: Dr. Kiss Annamaria This TDK presents a comparative questionnaire analysis of rehabilitation programs for aggressive dogs in the United States and Norway. Key aspects such as typical rehabilitation methods, the use of psychoactive drugs, sources of dog acquisition, and training techniques were thoroughly examined. This study is based on research data obtained from an online questionnaire distributed across various social media platforms, targeting individuals who own(ed) aggressive dog(s). The rehabilitation of aggressive dogs represents a complex and ongoing challenge. The primary objective of this TDK is to identify similarities and differences in the approaches taken by the United States and Norway toward rehabilitating aggressive dogs. Through 25 questions, a total of 60 respondents from Norway and 32 from the United States participated, giving valuable insight into their respective practices. The findings of this comparative study showed several significant patterns and distinctions between the two countries. Notably, rehabilitation programs in the United States reported a higher frequency of incorporating pharmaceutical interventions to manage aggression, while Norway relied more on non-pharmacological methods such as behavioral modification training. Regarding dog acquisition practices, our findings found that the United States primarily sources dogs from shelters, whereas acquiring dogs from breeders is most common in Norway. This difference could be due to variations in homeless dog populations, breeding practices, and cultural attitudes. However, the analysis conducted in this TDK reveals a similar age of onset of aggression and similar breeds, irrespective of acquisition. The study also shed light on training methods, showing different approaches. Dog owners in the United States employed aversive techniques and tools more frequently in their rehabilitation programs, while Norway favored positive reinforcement methods. These distinctions may be due to legislative differences between the two countries and offer valuable insights into their potential impact on the success of aggressive dog rehabilitation. In conclusion, this comparative study underscores the critical importance of understanding and applying research when developing and evaluating rehabilitation programs for aggressive dogs. The findings provide insights into how rehabilitation programs can enhance their effectiveness by incorporating psychoactive drugs, employing appropriate forms of behavioral modification training, and educating prospective dog owners about recognizing reputable dog breeders, effective dog training techniques, and sources for professional assistance. Further research in this field has the potential to lead the way for the development of a standardized, universal rehabilitation program for aggressive dogs, promoting more effective and humane rehabilitation practices that benefit both dogs and their human companions. List of lectures |